From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.ciao.gmane.io!not-for-mail From: ams@gnu.org (Alfred M. Szmidt) Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: dash.el [was: Re: Imports / inclusion of s.el into Emacs] Date: Mon, 11 May 2020 15:28:07 -0400 Message-ID: References: <35DBF02E-44D7-41E5-A217-7D6EC84ED221@icloud.com> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="ciao.gmane.io:159.69.161.202"; logging-data="99793"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: joostkremers@fastmail.fm, Emacs-devel@gnu.org, rms@gnu.org, phillip.lord@russet.org.uk To: pcr910303@icloud.com Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Mon May 11 21:33:45 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jYEBN-000Pqb-IG for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 11 May 2020 21:33:45 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:55606 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jYEBM-0001ky-Kn for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 11 May 2020 15:33:44 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:52966) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jYE6U-0004jm-O4 for Emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 11 May 2020 15:28:42 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:44896) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jYE6U-0004Rd-DF; Mon, 11 May 2020 15:28:42 -0400 Original-Received: from ams by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1jYE5v-0003PY-LG; Mon, 11 May 2020 15:28:08 -0400 In-reply-to: <35DBF02E-44D7-41E5-A217-7D6EC84ED221@icloud.com> (message from pcr910303@icloud.com on Tue, 12 May 2020 02:12:08 +0900) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:249874 Archived-At: All of this discussion started about having some more string functions and renaming some of them so that people didn't need to use s.el. Nobody has said no to adding specific functions to Emacs, nobody has rejected the idea of renaming functions where they make sense. The original proposal suggested renaming functions in s.el to be called string-* something. So it seems that from the start, renaming functions in s.el to follow a more Emacs Lisp style convention isn't entierly alien. But this seems to have had many objections recently.