From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.ciao.gmane.io!not-for-mail From: Richard Stallman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Word wrap for non-whitespace-seperated language Date: Sun, 08 Mar 2020 22:50:19 -0400 Message-ID: References: <838skgvu2l.fsf@gnu.org> <3692AB81-B291-4D14-BEDE-924F020D94ED@gmail.com> <837e00vsk9.fsf@gnu.org> <9737C398-80FC-4377-91BA-C0891BD5A0F5@gmail.com> <835zfjwgyb.fsf@gnu.org> <6DE83788-5296-4C4F-A265-88B33A43DC93@gmail.com> <4E3669DB-4012-4E56-9517-F1BEB0D97A78@gmail.com> <17F1587A-CE02-4BF7-9C53-68E66FD733ED@gmail.com> Reply-To: rms@gnu.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=Utf-8 Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="ciao.gmane.io:159.69.161.202"; logging-data="89395"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: eliz@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Yuan Fu Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Mon Mar 09 03:50:52 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jB8VH-000N9n-F5 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 09 Mar 2020 03:50:51 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:35488 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jB8VG-0001yI-HI for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 08 Mar 2020 22:50:50 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:33541) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jB8Un-0001Ug-Ds for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 08 Mar 2020 22:50:22 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:35252) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1jB8Un-00070X-9h; Sun, 08 Mar 2020 22:50:21 -0400 Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1jB8Ul-0001Rq-If; Sun, 08 Mar 2020 22:50:19 -0400 In-Reply-To: <17F1587A-CE02-4BF7-9C53-68E66FD733ED@gmail.com> (message from Yuan Fu on Sun, 8 Mar 2020 11:04:36 -0400) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:245376 Archived-At: [[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider ]]] [[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies, ]]] [[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]] > > Without truly filling the lines, do the commands C-a, C-n, etc work properly? > It depends on the commands: C-n/p works fine (given > line-move-visual is t), but C-a/e moves to the end of buffer line, > which is the beginning/end of the paragraph in a users eyes I was afraid it would be like that. I suppose that the rectangle commands don't work, and C-x = does something unhelpful. Is that so? What about C-x TAB? If all the commands that ought to make sense for such text understand how the display shows the line-wrapping, and DTRT, I suppose that will be as good as real wrapping. Would you like to work on that? -- Dr Richard Stallman Chief GNUisance of the GNU Project (https://gnu.org) Founder, Free Software Foundation (https://fsf.org) Internet Hall-of-Famer (https://internethalloffame.org)