From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.ciao.gmane.io!not-for-mail From: Richard Stallman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Extend gdb to filter registers Date: Sat, 25 Jan 2020 23:18:27 -0500 Message-ID: References: <878spmuerf.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <83wod3bx8i.fsf@gnu.org> <9f5ddaa5-0234-a17b-bdd7-81d70a0a50d6@gmx.at> <83FFF194-64CD-409E-8B7A-5A9DF91E79DE@gmail.com> <83v9pb314t.fsf@gnu.org> <838sm510d6.fsf@gnu.org> <83muakzoy5.fsf@gnu.org> <71042c9f-478b-47c8-f27e-1348e9f4536d@gmx.at> <83iml8zkbm.fsf@gnu.org> <6ad85759-7408-f177-38f6-45a72c2f5a9e@gmx.at> <83eevwzi79.fsf@gnu.org> <68ef651e-9319-b392-af1c-4564d5db9112@gmx.at> <831rrvzc81.fsf@gnu.org> <997C9AD2-D8DD-45DC-9195-28FEC907B2C4@gmail.com> <83muajxs04.fsf@gnu.org> <416593FF-C4BE-478F-B5AC-3379235146ED@gmail.com> <83lfq3xp66.fsf@gnu.org> <679953AF-F50A-4ABE-B836-150BA0F95DAE@gmail.com> <83h80rxlae.fsf@gnu.org> <8A5A507A-6036-4894-A8B1-749109EBE605@gmail.com> <83wo9mvwco.fsf@gnu.org> <2BEA3843-859E-481B-8561-35384438EF7F@gmail.com> <83lfpxs4sl.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: rms@gnu.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=Utf-8 Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="ciao.gmane.io:159.69.161.202"; logging-data="79313"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: casouri@gmail.com, juri@linkov.net, rudalics@gmx.at, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, eliz@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: John Yates Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sun Jan 26 05:19:03 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1ivZO1-000KXt-B3 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 26 Jan 2020 05:19:01 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:59336 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ivZO0-00042s-G3 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 25 Jan 2020 23:19:00 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:50776) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ivZNW-0003e0-HP for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 25 Jan 2020 23:18:31 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:40672) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ivZNV-0004EG-58; Sat, 25 Jan 2020 23:18:29 -0500 Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1ivZNT-0007d6-84; Sat, 25 Jan 2020 23:18:27 -0500 In-Reply-To: (message from John Yates on Fri, 24 Jan 2020 17:37:48 -0500) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:244643 Archived-At: [[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider ]]] [[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies, ]]] [[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]] > That said I think that the current windowing model > has a surprising semantic for dedicated, namely that > a dedicated window is allowed to be split. That does surprise me -- but with so many possible cases, can we be sure that it isn't sometime desirable to split those windows? It should be easy to add a global variable to control this. Its default could tentatively be not to split dedicated windows. If anyone is disappointed with that change, we would find out. -- Dr Richard Stallman Chief GNUisance of the GNU Project (https://gnu.org) Founder, Free Software Foundation (https://fsf.org) Internet Hall-of-Famer (https://internethalloffame.org)