From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Richard Stallman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Finding the dump Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2019 03:50:11 -0500 Message-ID: References: <83munr8jb1.fsf@gnu.org> <838szb8ey9.fsf@gnu.org> <83d0oj62bc.fsf@gnu.org> <87ef8z4g1m.fsf@igel.home> <838sz75u7p.fsf@gnu.org> <877eer4e4x.fsf@igel.home> <835zub5p3i.fsf@gnu.org> <8736pf408v.fsf@igel.home> <83womq3z5c.fsf@gnu.org> <871s4yxfvb.fsf@igel.home> <83o9823xcq.fsf@gnu.org> <87womqvyy4.fsf@igel.home> <4f30b2b598e71d2c6ad766a3da8e4a33.squirrel@dancol.org> <87o982vszn.fsf@igel.home> <87k1ipx3jq.fsf@igel.home> <87bm41wzmv.fsf@igel.home> <608533e75f41da3e36e191f8a670af05.squirrel@dancol.org> <725a9f97-8bb5-4592-2512-dbd422023f51@cs.ucla.edu> Reply-To: rms@gnu.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=Utf-8 Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="78379"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" Cc: eliz@gnu.org, dancol@dancol.org, schwab@linux-m68k.org, rpluim@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Paul Eggert Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Jan 29 09:50:22 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1goP65-000KGb-WD for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 29 Jan 2019 09:50:22 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:45527 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1goP64-0004Eo-KU for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 29 Jan 2019 03:50:20 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:59734) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1goP5x-0004Eg-G1 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 29 Jan 2019 03:50:14 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:39251) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1goP5v-0000Ol-Ga; Tue, 29 Jan 2019 03:50:11 -0500 Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1goP5v-00037N-B7; Tue, 29 Jan 2019 03:50:11 -0500 In-Reply-To: (message from Paul Eggert on Mon, 28 Jan 2019 11:23:28 -0800) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:232786 Archived-At: [[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider ]]] [[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies, ]]] [[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]] > When doing that, please consider the scenario where argv[0] does not > have a directory part (i.e., does not have a '/' in POSIX). In this case > in the past it has been reasonably common for argv[0] to not identify > the executable that would be found by searching PATH for a file with > that name, either because PATH itself has changed since the parent did > the search, or because the program is being executed in a chrooted jail, > or for some other reason. If this usage need not be supported by GNU > programs it would be helpful to have that clearly stated. The case exists, but is there anything to be said about it there? I don't see anything. -- Dr Richard Stallman President, Free Software Foundation (https://gnu.org, https://fsf.org) Internet Hall-of-Famer (https://internethalloffame.org)