From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Richard Stallman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [found the culprit] Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2018 18:01:01 -0500 Message-ID: References: <27024.1542249282@alto> Reply-To: rms@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=Utf-8 X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1542409167 10786 195.159.176.226 (16 Nov 2018 22:59:27 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2018 22:59:27 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Cl=C3=A9ment?= Pit-Claudel Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Nov 16 23:59:23 2018 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gNn58-0002fB-I9 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 16 Nov 2018 23:59:22 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:47344 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gNn7E-0005fL-Vu for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 16 Nov 2018 18:01:33 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:52755) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gNn78-0005fF-CD for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 16 Nov 2018 18:01:27 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gNn74-0002Wc-6b for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 16 Nov 2018 18:01:23 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:56436) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gNn6j-00022s-R2; Fri, 16 Nov 2018 18:01:01 -0500 Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1gNn6j-00083J-Ms; Fri, 16 Nov 2018 18:01:01 -0500 In-Reply-To: (message from =?iso-8859-1?Q?Cl=C3=A9ment?= Pit-Claudel on Thu, 15 Nov 2018 21:24:43 -0500) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:231205 Archived-At: [[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider ]]] [[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies, ]]] [[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]] > I think this distinction (unpacking vs decompressing) is too subtle. They don't seem even similar to me. tar xf and gunzip are not at all similar in spirit. > That is, should Z on a zip archive just change its compression > mode to store, without extracting the files? If there is such a thing as compression mode in a zip archive (I don't know), that would make sense. -- Dr Richard Stallman President, Free Software Foundation (https://gnu.org, https://fsf.org) Internet Hall-of-Famer (https://internethalloffame.org)