From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Richard Stallman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Can we go GTK-only? Date: Wed, 02 Nov 2016 21:25:02 -0400 Message-ID: References: <24db2975-17ca-ad01-20c8-df12071fa89a@dancol.org> <4615E73A-19E2-4B79-9889-D3FA686DDDE6@raeburn.org> <83bmy0pl8p.fsf@gnu.org> <831sywp7ew.fsf@gnu.org> <83y413nsjm.fsf@gnu.org> <83funbnngl.fsf@gnu.org> <83d1ifnmto.fsf@gnu.org> <20161101152027.5e94b6cc@jabberwock.cb.piermont.com> <83ziljm0ei.fsf@gnu.org> <83ins5nai2.fsf@gnu.org> <87wpglr8fk.fsf@thinkpad.rath.org> Reply-To: rms@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=Utf-8 X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1478136345 8122 195.159.176.226 (3 Nov 2016 01:25:45 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 3 Nov 2016 01:25:45 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Nikolaus Rath Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Nov 03 02:25:40 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1c26mQ-0007bE-Ij for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 03 Nov 2016 02:25:22 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:58460 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1c26mT-0003Gu-BJ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 02 Nov 2016 21:25:25 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:37268) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1c26mD-00038G-V7 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 02 Nov 2016 21:25:10 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1c26mC-0004SJ-W7 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 02 Nov 2016 21:25:10 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:44827) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1c26m7-0004MN-8J; Wed, 02 Nov 2016 21:25:03 -0400 Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1c26m6-0005iR-6Y; Wed, 02 Nov 2016 21:25:02 -0400 In-reply-to: <87wpglr8fk.fsf@thinkpad.rath.org> (message from Nikolaus Rath on Wed, 02 Nov 2016 12:25:03 -0700) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:209131 Archived-At: [[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider ]]] [[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies, ]]] [[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]] > GNU libc on Linux in 2008, it seems: Since Linux is just the kernel, not the whole system, this is not "on Linux". In this case, GNU libc is running on (and as part of) the GNU/Linux system. Even when you're talking about a past bug, or a present bug, we still deserve to get some of the credit when you talk about the GNU system. So would you please call it "GNU/Linux", never just "Linux"? See http://gnu.org/gnu/linux-and-gnu.html and http://gnu.org/gnu/gnu-linux-faq.html, plus the history in http://gnu.org/gnu/the-gnu-project.html. -- Dr Richard Stallman President, Free Software Foundation (gnu.org, fsf.org) Internet Hall-of-Famer (internethalloffame.org) Skype: No way! See stallman.org/skype.html.