From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Richard Stallman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: bug#23873: Emacs 24.0.94: With function argdesc bitstring, Elisp manual does not say how to get arg list Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2016 19:20:22 -0400 Message-ID: References: <871t3edfd9.fsf@gmx.net> Reply-To: rms@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=Utf-8 X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1467328929 20509 80.91.229.3 (30 Jun 2016 23:22:09 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2016 23:22:09 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 23873@debbugs.gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: rswgnu@gmail.com Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Jul 01 01:22:00 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1bIlHT-0004Wq-3X for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 01 Jul 2016 01:21:59 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:53020 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bIlHN-0000HF-7x for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 30 Jun 2016 19:21:53 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:47115) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bIlFy-0006S4-TX for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 30 Jun 2016 19:20:27 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bIlFw-0001Pd-Vn for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 30 Jun 2016 19:20:25 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:47684) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bIlFv-0001Of-IO; Thu, 30 Jun 2016 19:20:23 -0400 Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1bIlFu-0002vg-JI; Thu, 30 Jun 2016 19:20:22 -0400 In-reply-to: (message from Robert Weiner on Thu, 30 Jun 2016 11:46:16 -0400) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:205015 Archived-At: [[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider ]]] [[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies, ]]] [[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]] > For years, XEmacs has had functions for accessing parts of > byte-compiled code. It would be great if Emacs had some equivalents. There is nothing wrong with this, but it would be clutter. Why do you want them? Perhaps they can be defsubrs defined in a file that you'd load at compile time. -- Dr Richard Stallman President, Free Software Foundation (gnu.org, fsf.org) Internet Hall-of-Famer (internethalloffame.org) Skype: No way! See stallman.org/skype.html.