From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Richard Stallman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: eww Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2014 14:36:15 -0500 Message-ID: References: <87zjn0gmas.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> Reply-To: rms@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1389641779 10736 80.91.229.3 (13 Jan 2014 19:36:19 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2014 19:36:19 +0000 (UTC) Cc: lekktu@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Bastien Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Jan 13 20:36:28 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1W2nJD-0002n2-Dw for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 13 Jan 2014 20:36:27 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:44688 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W2nJD-0007yw-1a for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 13 Jan 2014 14:36:27 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:49809) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W2nJ2-0007ol-UU for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 13 Jan 2014 14:36:18 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W2nJ2-0008Gc-4e for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 13 Jan 2014 14:36:16 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:38065) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W2nJ2-0008GO-29 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 13 Jan 2014 14:36:16 -0500 Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W2nJ1-0001Ae-Gm; Mon, 13 Jan 2014 14:36:15 -0500 In-reply-to: <87zjn0gmas.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> (message from Bastien on Mon, 13 Jan 2014 12:20:59 +0100) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:168312 Archived-At: [[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider ]]] [[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies, ]]] [[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]] (define-alternatives web) (setq web-alternatives '(("eww" . eww))) M-x web RET TAB RET If the only user-level entry point for eww is `eww', this would do the right thing. Is that the case? For epa, there are several such entry points, including epa-mail-encrypt and epa-insert-keys. We could do (define-alternatives crypt-mail-encrypt) (define-alternatives crypt-insert-keys) with the suitable variable values, but that won't give the right result. The user would be asked to choose an alternative for crypt-mail-encrypt, and independently to choose an alternative for crypt-insert-keys. What we really want is for the two commands to be synced so that a single choice of alternative applies to both. -- Dr Richard Stallman President, Free Software Foundation 51 Franklin St Boston MA 02110 USA www.fsf.org www.gnu.org Skype: No way! That's nonfree (freedom-denying) software. Use Ekiga or an ordinary phone call.