From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Richard Stallman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Info: Console Vs GUI difference? Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2013 16:23:17 -0400 Message-ID: References: <52710DA9.2060704@poczta.onet.pl> Reply-To: rms@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1383251389 3341 80.91.229.3 (31 Oct 2013 20:29:49 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2013 20:29:49 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Jarek Czekalski Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Oct 31 21:29:55 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1VbysK-0005ke-SN for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 31 Oct 2013 21:29:52 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:59219 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VbysK-0003Th-FX for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 31 Oct 2013 16:29:52 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:53521) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Vbylz-00041i-AU for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 31 Oct 2013 16:23:20 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Vbyly-0000cU-6m for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 31 Oct 2013 16:23:19 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:36185) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Vbyly-0000cQ-3w for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 31 Oct 2013 16:23:18 -0400 Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Vbylx-00050L-5A; Thu, 31 Oct 2013 16:23:17 -0400 In-reply-to: <52710DA9.2060704@poczta.onet.pl> (message from Jarek Czekalski on Wed, 30 Oct 2013 14:46:17 +0100) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:164758 Archived-At: [ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider [ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies, [ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. But why do you call it a problem or an error? Since the signals are caught, everything is alright. That's what I think and said so in bug report 15670 [1]. And that's the reason why the bug was closed as "not a bug". It may not cause incorrect functioning, but it sounds like a cause of slowdown. Unless there is a reason why redisplay is supposed to raise a signal, this is making Emacs slower than it needs to be, and investigating the cause might be useful. And this "something" is also described in the bug report, in backtrace. It is redisplay. Redisplays do not occur on terminals. Redisplay does occur on terminals. Redisplay means showing the contents of buffers. -- Dr Richard Stallman President, Free Software Foundation 51 Franklin St Boston MA 02110 USA www.fsf.org www.gnu.org Skype: No way! That's nonfree (freedom-denying) software. Use Ekiga or an ordinary phone call.