From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Richard Stallman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Change in rmail-insert-mime-forwarded-message Date: Mon, 07 Jan 2013 21:11:30 -0500 Message-ID: References: <87hamttxf7.fsf@foil.strangled.net> Reply-To: rms@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1357611113 32649 80.91.229.3 (8 Jan 2013 02:11:53 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2013 02:11:53 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: mdl@alum.mit.edu Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Jan 08 03:12:09 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1TsOfg-00086G-Oq for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 08 Jan 2013 03:12:08 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:52238 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TsOfR-0007fL-52 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 07 Jan 2013 21:11:53 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:52510) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TsOfH-0007fD-UQ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 07 Jan 2013 21:11:51 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TsOf5-00046Q-8L for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 07 Jan 2013 21:11:43 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:44671) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TsOf5-00046E-58 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 07 Jan 2013 21:11:31 -0500 Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TsOf4-0001aJ-0i; Mon, 07 Jan 2013 21:11:30 -0500 In-reply-to: <87hamttxf7.fsf@foil.strangled.net> (message from Mark Lillibridge on Sun, 06 Jan 2013 20:43:56 -0800) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:156128 Archived-At: You want to insert the undecoded but unmbox-escaped message. I am not sure what that means. What is "unmbox-escaped"? How does that relate to decoding? And why do you think this behavior is the right behavior, rather than forwarding the message as displayed? The visible message is very likely not a valid RFC message because it is missing headers and boundary parts. It also likely is missing some of the attachments. Yes, but why do you think that is wrong? If f forwards whatever is displayed, the user has the choice to type v and forward the undecoded message, or not type v, and forward the message as decoded with selected parts visible. -- Dr Richard Stallman President, Free Software Foundation 51 Franklin St Boston MA 02110 USA www.fsf.org www.gnu.org Skype: No way! That's nonfree (freedom-denying) software. Use Ekiga or an ordinary phone call