From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Richard Stallman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: inlinable functions instead of macros Date: Sat, 18 Aug 2012 15:08:29 -0400 Message-ID: References: Reply-To: rms@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1345316920 22502 80.91.229.3 (18 Aug 2012 19:08:40 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 18 Aug 2012 19:08:40 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Aug 18 21:08:40 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1T2oNw-00074P-Cu for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 18 Aug 2012 21:08:36 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:34684 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1T2oNv-0006vE-1G for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 18 Aug 2012 15:08:35 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:52475) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1T2oNr-0006nL-VU for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 18 Aug 2012 15:08:32 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1T2oNq-0006H8-Vs for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 18 Aug 2012 15:08:31 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([208.118.235.10]:37304) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1T2oNq-0006H3-Sy for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 18 Aug 2012 15:08:30 -0400 Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1T2oNp-0003eQ-RS; Sat, 18 Aug 2012 15:08:29 -0400 In-reply-to: (message from Stefan Monnier on Fri, 17 Aug 2012 19:48:50 -0400) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 208.118.235.10 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:152645 Archived-At: lisp.h:2416: Emacs fatal error: assertion failed: found == !EQ (blv->defcell, blv->valcell) I.e. the file&line info is always the same rather than giving the file&line where the inlinable function was called. Could a GCC improvement be a good fix for this? For instance, if it allowed the assertion failure to find and mention the source location of the function's caller? -- Dr Richard Stallman President, Free Software Foundation 51 Franklin St Boston MA 02110 USA www.fsf.org www.gnu.org Skype: No way! That's nonfree (freedom-denying) software. Use Ekiga or an ordinary phone call