From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Windows' "split status" Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2011 06:27:01 -0500 Message-ID: References: <87vcqqoekt.fsf@gnu.org> <4EBD6B63.4050607@gmx.at> <87vcqq6utg.fsf@gnu.org> <4EBE4414.10009@gmx.at> <87d3cwr9hc.fsf@gnu.org> <4EBFA0AF.7000608@gmx.at> <87obwgatpy.fsf@gnu.org> <4EBFFBA5.1000309@gmx.at> <87hb26gdx8.fsf@gnu.org> <4EC213EA.4080304@gmx.at> <871ut9n2rr.fsf@gnu.org> <4EC2821C.4020400@gmx.at> <87sjlfxbg1.fsf@spindle.srvr.nix> <4ECCFFF7.1030702@gmx.at> <83ehwyagdw.fsf@gnu.org> <4ECD47BA.7020509@gmx.at> <838vn6a969.fsf@gnu.org> <4ECE15A4.1070808@gmx.at> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1322134038 28555 80.91.229.12 (24 Nov 2011 11:27:18 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2011 11:27:18 +0000 (UTC) Cc: nix@esperi.org.uk, cyd@gnu.org, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: martin rudalics Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Nov 24 12:27:14 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RTXST-0006Cm-Rr for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 24 Nov 2011 12:27:14 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:46710 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RTXST-0001Ij-Dq for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 24 Nov 2011 06:27:13 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:46759) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RTXSN-0001Id-8k for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 24 Nov 2011 06:27:11 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RTXSH-0007K4-Hh for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 24 Nov 2011 06:27:07 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]:36756) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RTXSH-0007Jy-Ev for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 24 Nov 2011 06:27:01 -0500 Original-Received: from eliz by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RTXSH-0000Hf-AB; Thu, 24 Nov 2011 06:27:01 -0500 In-reply-to: <4ECE15A4.1070808@gmx.at> (message from martin rudalics on Thu, 24 Nov 2011 11:00:04 +0100) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.10 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:146200 Archived-At: > Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2011 11:00:04 +0100 > From: martin rudalics > CC: nix@esperi.org.uk, cyd@gnu.org, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, > emacs-devel@gnu.org > > > http://idioms.yourdictionary.com/at-all-times > > Both http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/always and > http://www.thefreedictionary.com/always give for "always" the > definition "at all times". Of course. But it was you who said that "always" is ambiguous, so I suggested a synonym that isn't.