From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.windows,gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: emacs-20111024-r106182 Windows Binaries Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2011 09:12:01 -0400 Message-ID: References: <864nyxohb6.fsf@googlemail.com> <86k47t4phi.fsf@gmail.com> <86wrbtmyj8.fsf@googlemail.com> <86fwih4o93.fsf@gmail.com> <86y5w9fowr.fsf@gmail.com> <86sjmhmety.fsf@googlemail.com> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1319548335 22236 80.91.229.12 (25 Oct 2011 13:12:15 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2011 13:12:15 +0000 (UTC) Cc: help-emacs-windows@gnu.org, sdl.web@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Christoph Scholtes Original-X-From: help-emacs-windows-bounces+gnu-help-emacs-windows=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Oct 25 15:12:10 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: gnu-help-emacs-windows@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RIgnY-0008Jh-74 for gnu-help-emacs-windows@m.gmane.org; Tue, 25 Oct 2011 15:12:08 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:54639 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RIgnX-000579-Es for gnu-help-emacs-windows@m.gmane.org; Tue, 25 Oct 2011 09:12:07 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:51844) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RIgnS-000563-FQ for help-emacs-windows@gnu.org; Tue, 25 Oct 2011 09:12:03 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RIgnR-0000xs-96 for help-emacs-windows@gnu.org; Tue, 25 Oct 2011 09:12:02 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]:37823) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RIgnR-0000xm-7Z; Tue, 25 Oct 2011 09:12:01 -0400 Original-Received: from eliz by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RIgnR-0006n3-2h; Tue, 25 Oct 2011 09:12:01 -0400 In-reply-to: <86sjmhmety.fsf@googlemail.com> (message from Christoph Scholtes on Tue, 25 Oct 2011 06:32:41 -0600) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.10 X-BeenThere: help-emacs-windows@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion forum for users of the GNU Emacs port to Windows List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: help-emacs-windows-bounces+gnu-help-emacs-windows=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: help-emacs-windows-bounces+gnu-help-emacs-windows=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.windows:5136 gmane.emacs.devel:145516 Archived-At: > From: Christoph Scholtes > Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2011 06:32:41 -0600 > Cc: help-emacs-windows@gnu.org, Leo , emacs-devel@gnu.org > > Eli Zaretskii writes: > > >> > >> emacs.exe > >> 24.0.90.0 > >> 4e9e1382 > >> ntdll.dll > >> 6.1.7601.17514 > >> 4ce7ba58 > >> c0000029 > >> 000907b6 > >> 760 > >> 01cc91fd0016c7e4 > >> D:\emacs-24.0.90\bin\emacs.exe > >> C:\windows\SysWOW64\ntdll.dll > > > > Yes, that's the same crash that I cited. > > Leo said that this happens with the last weekly build I provided. It was > compiled _without_ optimizations. The original report claimed to compile > with `-O2'. I didn't realize the above crash was with your binaries. If it was, it's probably a different problem. Leo, if you have a way of reproducing this, please run under GDB and produce a backtrace, or better yet, show the recipe (and file a bug report). > Just to make sure, is specifying `--no-opt' enough to disable > optimizations when configuring or do I have to specify `-O0' > explicitely? Specifying --no-opt is enough. > If this turns out to be a problem with 4.6.1 in general, I will switch > back to an older version. Or should I use `-fno-omit-frame-pointer'? With --no-opt, -fno-omit-frame-pointer should have no effect, because this optimization is turned on by -O1.