From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: bidi-display-reordering is now non-nil by default
Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2011 00:50:44 -0400
Message-ID: <E1Qr0ke-0000JZ-A1@fencepost.gnu.org>
References: <E1QnPL7-0000uL-Mq@fencepost.gnu.org>
	<E1QnWXz-000314-5G@fencepost.gnu.org>
	<877h6y7chn.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <831ux6cv5o.fsf@gnu.org>
	<yx21ux653we.fsf@mohsen.1.banan.byname.net> <87d3gpku3o.fsf@gnus.org>
	<yx2ty9z9p9d.fsf@mohsen.1.banan.byname.net>
	<m3y5za72rn.fsf@stories.gnus.org> <834o1ypa2b.fsf@gnu.org>
	<87aabnn3mz.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <83mxfnwwyd.fsf@gnu.org>
	<87ipqbzogt.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <83liv7wqhe.fsf@gnu.org>
	<87liv75xsh.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <83k4arvx05.fsf@gnu.org>
	<87bow116je.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <83wrepyq3r.fsf@gnu.org>
	<87sjpar2l2.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <83aabizh94.fsf@gnu.org>
	<87vcu6b4rp.fsf@stupidchicken.com>
	<jwvfwlaccfy.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org>
	<8739hank3b.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org>
Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org
X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1312951860 13446 80.91.229.12 (10 Aug 2011 04:51:00 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2011 04:51:00 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
To: David Kastrup <dak@gnu.org>
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Aug 10 06:50:56 2011
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17])
	by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>)
	id 1Qr0kk-0004wK-8E
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 10 Aug 2011 06:50:50 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:55891 helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>)
	id 1Qr0ki-000620-Co
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 10 Aug 2011 00:50:48 -0400
Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:55472)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>) id 1Qr0kf-00061v-JT
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 10 Aug 2011 00:50:46 -0400
Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>) id 1Qr0ke-0003Li-KE
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 10 Aug 2011 00:50:45 -0400
Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]:59824)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>)
	id 1Qr0ke-0003Le-Ip
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 10 Aug 2011 00:50:44 -0400
Original-Received: from eliz by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>)
	id 1Qr0ke-0000JZ-A1; Wed, 10 Aug 2011 00:50:44 -0400
In-reply-to: <8739hank3b.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> (message from David Kastrup on
	Wed, 10 Aug 2011 03:14:48 +0200)
X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3)
X-Received-From: 140.186.70.10
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: </archive/html/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:143090
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/143090>

> From: David Kastrup <dak@gnu.org>
> Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2011 03:14:48 +0200
> 
> Emacs should not insert LRM marks on its own in pure left-to-right
> text.

Then what about the other alternative that was proposed: separate
fields with TABs, possibly invisible?  That would at most give you TAB
characters, which are just ASCII.  No one responded to that suggestion
yet.