From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: bidi-display-reordering is now non-nil by default Date: Wed, 03 Aug 2011 08:57:43 -0400 Message-ID: References: <83fwlqe2xy.fsf@gnu.org> <20110731.005516.149395323.wl@gnu.org> <20110731.082721.451360942.wl@gnu.org> <87d3gp3zkd.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <83oc09auwt.fsf@gnu.org> <87aabskh1u.fsf@gnus.org> <831ux3buyy.fsf@gnu.org> <83pqkna99r.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1312376282 5691 80.91.229.12 (3 Aug 2011 12:58:02 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 3 Aug 2011 12:58:02 +0000 (UTC) Cc: larsi@gnus.org, list-general@mohsen.1.banan.byname.net, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: James Cloos Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Aug 03 14:57:58 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Qob1I-000347-G9 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 03 Aug 2011 14:57:56 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:50373 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Qob1H-0005T3-Se for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 03 Aug 2011 08:57:55 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:42075) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Qob1E-0005SN-TA for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 03 Aug 2011 08:57:53 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Qob19-0007ZN-HA for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 03 Aug 2011 08:57:52 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]:42900) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Qob19-0007ZD-FV for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 03 Aug 2011 08:57:47 -0400 Original-Received: from eliz by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Qob15-0005ej-Uq; Wed, 03 Aug 2011 08:57:43 -0400 In-reply-to: (message from James Cloos on Wed, 03 Aug 2011 08:08:30 -0400) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.10 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:142805 Archived-At: > From: James Cloos > Cc: list-general@mohsen.1.banan.byname.net, larsi@gnus.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org > Date: Wed, 03 Aug 2011 08:08:30 -0400 > > If you write about something other than what I saw, it must only occur > with customized summary formats. With the default format the *only* > problem was the overall buffer direction, and only when the first name > was r2l and there were no marks on that line. > > Everything else displays here without error. Did you have email messages or articles whose Subject included R2L letters? The problem I was talking about happens only when the Subject ends with R2L characters, and then the line count that follows it in the summary display is aligned incorrectly. Look at the example posted by Mohsen that I quoted a few messages back.