From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Richard Stallman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [Emacs-diffs] /srv/bzr/emacs/trunk r104691: Don't reuse previous Message-id when resending. Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2011 12:13:41 -0400 Message-ID: References: <87mxh37nfp.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> <87r56f10jd.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> <4E093222.3060302@gmail.com> Reply-To: rms@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1309278672 7062 80.91.229.12 (28 Jun 2011 16:31:12 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2011 16:31:12 +0000 (UTC) Cc: stephen@xemacs.org, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Daniel Colascione Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Jun 28 18:31:08 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QbbBm-00040n-Sd for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 18:31:03 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:40375 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QbbBl-0005Gw-JY for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 12:31:01 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:57970) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QbavC-0000hZ-NW for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 12:13:57 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QbavA-0005R1-5N for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 12:13:54 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]:58492) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Qbav9-0005Qv-Uv for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 12:13:52 -0400 Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Qbauz-0007FO-Ve; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 12:13:41 -0400 In-reply-to: <4E093222.3060302@gmail.com> (message from Daniel Colascione on Mon, 27 Jun 2011 18:45:06 -0700) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.10 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:141138 Archived-At: You should reconsider that decision. Stephen's message cogently explains _exactly_ why the behavior specified in the RFC is also the right thing to do. I don't know what it explains, and I am not going to try to find out. I am not going to read a long, arrogant and hostile message, some of which is clearly based on false premises, to see if any parts of it might be valid. If he thinks I am wrong, and wants me to pay attention to his opinion, he should present it to me in a way that isn't hostile and doesn't waste my time. And he should recognize that Emacs maintenance decisions do not require his approval. -- Dr Richard Stallman President, Free Software Foundation 51 Franklin St Boston MA 02110 USA www.fsf.org, www.gnu.org Skype: No way! That's nonfree (freedom-denying) software. Use free telephony http://directory.fsf.org/category/tel/