From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Richard Stallman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Emacs and the Status Notification Specification Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2011 19:02:50 -0400 Message-ID: References: <87wrgcz9ks.fsf@lifelogs.com> <8762nrcl8k.fsf@lifelogs.com> Reply-To: rms@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1309215800 24984 80.91.229.12 (27 Jun 2011 23:03:20 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2011 23:03:20 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Jun 28 01:03:16 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QbKpn-0000Q3-QA for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 01:03:15 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:51148 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QbKpm-00071e-UD for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 27 Jun 2011 19:03:15 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:37768) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QbKpS-000712-5Z for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 27 Jun 2011 19:02:56 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QbKpP-0007hG-TY for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 27 Jun 2011 19:02:53 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]:56786) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QbKpP-0007hC-S0 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 27 Jun 2011 19:02:51 -0400 Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QbKpO-0001LN-SD; Mon, 27 Jun 2011 19:02:51 -0400 In-reply-to: <8762nrcl8k.fsf@lifelogs.com> (message from Ted Zlatanov on Mon, 27 Jun 2011 11:06:19 -0500) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.10 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:141097 Archived-At: My point is that if it's an ELPA package, it can be easily used (installed+activated) from XEmacs. That is true, but that is not a factor in our decision about whether to put this in ELPA. It is neither here nor there. -- Dr Richard Stallman President, Free Software Foundation 51 Franklin St Boston MA 02110 USA www.fsf.org, www.gnu.org Skype: No way! That's nonfree (freedom-denying) software. Use free telephony http://directory.fsf.org/category/tel/