From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Pretest begins end-June Date: Tue, 31 May 2011 05:03:41 -0400 Message-ID: References: <87y61ojhp4.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <83zkm4f3es.fsf@gnu.org> <83sjrvgaf5.fsf@gnu.org> <87sjrvgvg8.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1306832635 22891 80.91.229.12 (31 May 2011 09:03:55 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 31 May 2011 09:03:55 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: David Kastrup Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue May 31 11:03:51 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QRKrf-0002kR-CE for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 31 May 2011 11:03:51 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:56473 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QRKre-0003hH-Gj for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 31 May 2011 05:03:50 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:49585) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QRKrX-0003hB-9Q for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 31 May 2011 05:03:48 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QRKrW-0004YA-BE for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 31 May 2011 05:03:43 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]:57231) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QRKrW-0004Y6-8S for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 31 May 2011 05:03:42 -0400 Original-Received: from eliz by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QRKrV-00074n-LY; Tue, 31 May 2011 05:03:41 -0400 In-reply-to: <87sjrvgvg8.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> (message from David Kastrup on Tue, 31 May 2011 09:50:31 +0200) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.10 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:139946 Archived-At: > From: David Kastrup > Date: Tue, 31 May 2011 09:50:31 +0200 > > IIRC, by far the worst contender for confusing the display engine > was when the text hidden by the display string contained newlines, I'm not surprised. Newlines in the buffer serve as anchors for the display engine when it moves non-linearly, e.g. goes back by N lines. Handling the case where a newline does not indicate a beginning of a new screen line is painful and tricky. > Newlines. And now we are talking about R2L. Well, at least with R2L users can turn off the reordering if it happens to screw them up too badly.