From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: INLINE -> inline (was: md5 broken?) Date: Sun, 29 May 2011 00:51:22 -0400 Message-ID: References: <87ipsv188f.fsf@gmail.com> <87zkm7t3n4.fsf@rho.meyering.net> <83hb8fasyb.fsf@gnu.org> <87lixrt0fx.fsf@rho.meyering.net> <83fwnyc3v1.fsf@gnu.org> <4DE11E56.9040506@cs.ucla.edu> <83d3j2bw9g.fsf@gnu.org> <4DE14913.9080507@cs.ucla.edu> <838vtqbotu.fsf@gnu.org> <4DE17B71.80102@cs.ucla.edu> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1306644693 24544 80.91.229.12 (29 May 2011 04:51:33 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 29 May 2011 04:51:33 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org, jim@meyering.net, antoine.levitt@gmail.com To: Paul Eggert Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun May 29 06:51:29 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QQXyL-0001K2-CN for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 29 May 2011 06:51:29 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:42747 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QQXyK-0006gh-38 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 29 May 2011 00:51:28 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:55993) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QQXyH-0006gW-0x for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 29 May 2011 00:51:25 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QQXyF-0003g1-SL for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 29 May 2011 00:51:24 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]:54489) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QQXyF-0003fx-Pj for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 29 May 2011 00:51:23 -0400 Original-Received: from eliz by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QQXyE-0002mt-WB; Sun, 29 May 2011 00:51:22 -0400 In-reply-to: <4DE17B71.80102@cs.ucla.edu> (message from Paul Eggert on Sat, 28 May 2011 15:47:13 -0700) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.10 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:139866 Archived-At: > Date: Sat, 28 May 2011 15:47:13 -0700 > From: Paul Eggert > CC: jim@meyering.net, antoine.levitt@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org > > On 05/28/11 12:35, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > I'm saying that we should have only > > one of "INLINE" and "inline", not both. > > Yes, that makes sense. Since 'inline' is standard and is widely > used in other GNU packages, it makes sense to use it in Emacs too. > That will shorten the Emacs source code and make it easier for > others to understand. Here's a proposed patch to do that. Looks good to me, thanks.