From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: splitting ChangeLogs Date: Wed, 06 Apr 2011 05:19:19 -0400 Message-ID: References: <83k4f8uls8.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1302081599 6234 80.91.229.12 (6 Apr 2011 09:19:59 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 6 Apr 2011 09:19:59 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Juanma Barranquero Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Apr 06 11:19:54 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Q7Ou2-0008Aq-Fs for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 06 Apr 2011 11:19:54 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:36357 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Q7Ou1-0004rN-51 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 06 Apr 2011 05:19:53 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=46858 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Q7OtV-0004Ju-Bq for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 06 Apr 2011 05:19:22 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Q7OtT-00041O-OI for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 06 Apr 2011 05:19:20 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]:59890) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Q7OtT-00041K-K6 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 06 Apr 2011 05:19:19 -0400 Original-Received: from eliz by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Q7OtT-0002uy-IO; Wed, 06 Apr 2011 05:19:19 -0400 In-reply-to: (message from Juanma Barranquero on Wed, 6 Apr 2011 05:24:27 +0200) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.10 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:138220 Archived-At: > From: Juanma Barranquero > Date: Wed, 6 Apr 2011 05:24:27 +0200 > Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org > > On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 05:00, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > > Why not at 23.3? > > There's no entry for "Branch for 23.3" in the ChangeLogs That in itself seems like some kind of snafu. There should be such an entry, since I now understand that the ChangeLog is also merged automatically from the branch. > (I don't know why there's an entry for 23.2, as it wasn't branched > from trunk, but still...) That's CVS-speak ;-) With bzr we shouldn't have such problems. The entry should be there, or else years from now, you won't be able to know when was Emacs 23.3 released without having the branch in your local sandbox.