From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [PATCH] GnuTLS support on Woe32 Date: Tue, 08 Mar 2011 04:29:37 -0500 Message-ID: References: <87ipvwl1nx.wl%claudio.bley@gmail.com> <83oc5ogp89.fsf@gnu.org> <87ipvuwslp.wl%claudio.bley@gmail.com> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1299576632 14579 80.91.229.12 (8 Mar 2011 09:30:32 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2011 09:30:32 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Mar 08 10:30:28 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PwtFL-00073S-Tr for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 08 Mar 2011 10:30:28 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:36634 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PwtFL-0003Gs-8X for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 08 Mar 2011 04:30:27 -0500 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=56549 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PwtEc-00034Z-VY for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 08 Mar 2011 04:29:43 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PwtEY-0004SU-Rc for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 08 Mar 2011 04:29:42 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]:57354) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PwtEY-0004SK-On for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 08 Mar 2011 04:29:38 -0500 Original-Received: from eliz by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PwtEX-00049V-Sh; Tue, 08 Mar 2011 04:29:37 -0500 In-reply-to: (message from Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen on Tue, 08 Mar 2011 10:14:04 +0100) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.10 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:136880 Archived-At: > From: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen > Date: Tue, 08 Mar 2011 10:14:04 +0100 > Mail-Copies-To: never > > Eli Zaretskii writes: > > > It should probably simply be a defcustom. I don't see how ``higher > > levels of code'' could ever DTRT in this respect. If they can know > > something about that, so can gnutls.el. > > Well, there are several issues here. [...] If what you wrote was supposed to explain why a defcustom would not be a good idea, then I must admit I didn't understand what you wrote.