From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: configure{.in,} question Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2010 05:15:58 -0400 Message-ID: References: <09k4l72w3b.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1287999736 6935 80.91.229.12 (25 Oct 2010 09:42:16 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2010 09:42:16 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Julien Danjou Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Oct 25 11:42:14 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PAJZF-0007gU-9q for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 25 Oct 2010 11:42:13 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:36384 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PAJOC-0005dF-HF for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 25 Oct 2010 05:30:48 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=33994 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PAJ9s-0001H6-P0 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 25 Oct 2010 05:16:01 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PAJ9r-0001DG-MO for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 25 Oct 2010 05:16:00 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]:57890) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PAJ9r-0001DC-J5 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 25 Oct 2010 05:15:59 -0400 Original-Received: from eliz by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PAJ9q-0002J6-Ol; Mon, 25 Oct 2010 05:15:58 -0400 In-reply-to: (message from Julien Danjou on Mon, 25 Oct 2010 10:47:39 +0200) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:132086 Archived-At: > From: Julien Danjou > Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2010 10:47:39 +0200 > Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org > > On Sun, Oct 24 2010, Glenn Morris wrote: > > > I have wondered whether configure even needs to be in the repository. > > Me too. Almost all project I know using which are using autoconf do not > store the configure file for obvious reasons you cited. > I really think it's bad practice to store that in the repository. But doing so makes sure everybody can run the configure script, even if the version of Autoconf installed on the user's machine has some bug that affects Emacs. > It's like you were storing .o files. :) Not like that at all. Not every generated file should be omitted. We have other generated files in the repository, take a look at admin/charsets and admin/unidata. There's nothing wrong with that, really.