From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Intervals crash Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2010 04:36:30 -0400 Message-ID: References: <87aan82uar.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <83bp7ouw2u.fsf@gnu.org> <87bp7n3c19.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> <83iq1vtv3y.fsf@gnu.org> <87wrqb1q2b.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> <83fwwztq4e.fsf@gnu.org> <87sk0x28pr.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> <83y6aprehh.fsf@gnu.org> <87hbhd1wn4.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> <83vd5tqxyp.fsf@gnu.org> <87eicg1wl5.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> <878w2o1fa3.fsf@catnip.gol.com> <87y6aneqhs.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> <87fwwvd6aq.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1285577229 29062 80.91.229.12 (27 Sep 2010 08:47:09 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2010 08:47:09 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: David Kastrup Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Sep 27 10:47:08 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1P09Ma-0005u7-D9 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 27 Sep 2010 10:47:08 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:53994 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1P09MZ-0005Tm-E6 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 27 Sep 2010 04:47:07 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=40131 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1P09MF-00057n-Td for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 27 Sep 2010 04:46:54 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1P09CJ-0007JS-DC for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 27 Sep 2010 04:36:32 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]:42865) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1P09CJ-0007JO-Bf for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 27 Sep 2010 04:36:31 -0400 Original-Received: from eliz by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1P09CI-0003Hr-Q7; Mon, 27 Sep 2010 04:36:30 -0400 In-reply-to: <87fwwvd6aq.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> (message from David Kastrup on Mon, 27 Sep 2010 08:55:25 +0200) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:130978 Archived-At: > From: David Kastrup > Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2010 08:55:25 +0200 > > Personally, I was surprised that we have EMACS_UINT at all since Emacs > integers are, after all, signed I think it was used as a portable unsigned data type.