From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Richard Stallman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: moving more cl seq/mapping support into core Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2010 02:27:32 -0400 Message-ID: References: Reply-To: rms@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1285569861 32445 80.91.229.12 (27 Sep 2010 06:44:21 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2010 06:44:21 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Leo Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Sep 27 08:44:20 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1P07Rj-0003WA-95 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 27 Sep 2010 08:44:19 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:36179 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1P07DS-00041D-Sj for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 27 Sep 2010 02:29:34 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=37617 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1P07DI-0003Up-2a for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 27 Sep 2010 02:29:24 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1P07BU-0008GZ-Up for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 27 Sep 2010 02:27:33 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]:40097) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1P07BU-0008GU-TZ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 27 Sep 2010 02:27:32 -0400 Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1P07BU-0005Uv-FJ; Mon, 27 Sep 2010 02:27:32 -0400 In-reply-to: (message from Leo on Sun, 26 Sep 2010 14:13:07 +0100) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:130969 Archived-At: Thanks. I think we need not to worry the user address space too much. That would be a change for the worse in our standard of documentation. > Aside from that, the keyword-based interfaces of these functions does > not fit the style of Emacs Lisp very well. But all the major build blocks like define-derived-mode, defcustom, define-minor-mode, easy-menu-define etc use keyword arguments. Those are all rather heavy things by nature, so if the calling sequence is heavy too, that's ok. If I added a `remove-if' function I would like it not to be so heavy to use.