From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Richard Stallman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Google modules integration Date: Mon, 13 Sep 2010 03:18:54 -0400 Message-ID: References: <878w3a1x9s.fsf@keller.adm.naquadah.org> <81occ6zdnh.fsf@gmail.com> <878w3627q1.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> Reply-To: rms@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1284362342 29821 80.91.229.12 (13 Sep 2010 07:19:02 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 13 Sep 2010 07:19:02 +0000 (UTC) Cc: lekktu@gmail.com, lennart.borgman@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, carsten.dominik@gmail.com, julien@danjou.info, kjambunathan@gmail.com To: "Stephen J. Turnbull" Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Sep 13 09:18:59 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Ov3Ja-0006wT-HY for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 13 Sep 2010 09:18:58 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:43411 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Ov3JZ-0004SZ-QY for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 13 Sep 2010 03:18:57 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=57666 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Ov3JS-0004Rn-8U for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 13 Sep 2010 03:18:51 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Ov3JQ-0003mQ-FG for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 13 Sep 2010 03:18:50 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]:48990) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Ov3JQ-0003mM-D0 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 13 Sep 2010 03:18:48 -0400 Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Ov3JW-0001O0-O1; Mon, 13 Sep 2010 03:18:54 -0400 In-reply-to: <878w3627q1.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> (stephen@xemacs.org) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:130033 Archived-At: > IANAL, but it seems quite fishy. Assume you argue that you used the > APIs without reading that. You really don't want to go down that road without a lawyer's advice. An argument of exactly the same form applies to the GPL. These two issues are totally different, in legal terms. The GNU GPL simply exercises copyright. Those "terms of service" try to make a contract.