From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Francesco =?utf-8?Q?Potort=C3=AC?= Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: How do I use tags to go to begv_byte instead of BEGV_BYTE? Date: Wed, 01 Sep 2010 14:38:56 +0200 Message-ID: References: <8762yup6tg.fsf@gmail.com> <87mxs3rd9l.fsf@gmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1283344804 29233 80.91.229.12 (1 Sep 2010 12:40:04 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 1 Sep 2010 12:40:04 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Wojciech Meyer , Andreas Schwab , Lennart Borgman , Stefan Monnier , Emacs-Devel devel To: Wojciech Meyer Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Sep 01 14:40:01 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Oqmbg-0002R3-M2 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 01 Sep 2010 14:40:00 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:58254 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Oqmbg-00063K-4W for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 01 Sep 2010 08:40:00 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=43802 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OqmbY-00062X-5r for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 01 Sep 2010 08:39:53 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OqmbW-0008TO-Pl for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 01 Sep 2010 08:39:52 -0400 Original-Received: from mx2.isti.cnr.it ([194.119.192.4]:3530) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OqmbW-0008QG-8t for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 01 Sep 2010 08:39:50 -0400 Original-Received: from conversionlocal.isti.cnr.it by mx.isti.cnr.it (PMDF V6.5 #31825) id <01NRDMYE1N00I53R02@mx.isti.cnr.it> for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 01 Sep 2010 14:38:58 +0100 Original-Received: from tucano.isti.cnr.it (tucano.isti.cnr.it [146.48.81.102]) by mx.isti.cnr.it (PMDF V6.5 #31826) with ESMTPSA id <01NRDMYE5RQUIU243D@mx.isti.cnr.it>; Wed, 01 Sep 2010 14:38:58 +0100 Original-Received: from pot by tucano.isti.cnr.it with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Oqmae-00088V-VY; Wed, 01 Sep 2010 14:38:57 +0200 In-reply-to: <87mxs3rd9l.fsf@gmail.com> X-INSM-ip-source: 146.48.81.102 Auth Done X-fingerprint: 4B02 6187 5C03 D6B1 2E31 7666 09DF 2DC9 BE21 6115 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: OpenVMS 7.2 (Multinet 4.3-4.4 stack) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:129552 Archived-At: >Wojciech Meyer writes: > >> Stefan Monnier writes: >> >>> Nowadays, I think etags.el would deserve to be improved so as to taken >>> the major mode into account, and also so as to give precedence to >>> case-exact matches, and also to automatically try the second-choice if >>> the first makes you jump to where you started. >>> >>> IOW patches welcome, >> >> Here is another one. >> >> `tags-major-mode-sensitive' customisation allows to specify if `etags' >> package should be sensitive on a major mode. If so, it looks only for >> files with the names matching entries of `auto-mode-alist' of the major mode. >> It does not hit performance that much, if it is a problem, making a >> simple assumption about last search would be sufficient (however I've >> checked it on the Emacs code base, and seems to run OK). >> >> BTW: Integrating etags with ede projects might be a good idea. >> >> Cheers; >> Wojciech > >Hi, > >Is anybody interested in this patch at all? :) (i would be glad to hear >at least the reason of refusal or acceptance, to do the rest of the >hacking work on `etags.el') I have not used etags for some time now, mostly because I have not done development on multi-file projects for some years. But I think that etags.el should in fact take the major mode into account.