From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Richard Stallman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Bug statistics Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2010 11:40:50 -0400 Message-ID: References: <1focf1eb1p.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> Reply-To: rms@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1277394173 22141 80.91.229.12 (24 Jun 2010 15:42:53 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2010 15:42:53 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Glenn Morris Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Jun 24 17:42:52 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ORoZW-0002sq-G3 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 24 Jun 2010 17:42:50 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:36122 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1ORoZ8-0004VB-DZ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 24 Jun 2010 11:42:10 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=52322 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1ORoZ3-0004Ux-B4 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 24 Jun 2010 11:42:05 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1ORoZ2-0005pB-Af for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 24 Jun 2010 11:42:05 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]:44712) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1ORoYf-0005nL-Lc for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 24 Jun 2010 11:42:04 -0400 Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ORoXq-0003Yz-V0; Thu, 24 Jun 2010 11:40:50 -0400 In-reply-to: <1focf1eb1p.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> (message from Glenn Morris on Wed, 23 Jun 2010 16:41:54 -0400) X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:126363 Archived-At: 4594 reports [1] 2647 closed reports Amost 2000 bug reports not closed is rather disturbing. 14% have been marked "minor" 20% have been marked "wishlist" 9% are tagged "moreinfo" 5% are tagged "wontfix". That is about 40%. It seems to imply there are around 1200 bug reports which are not marked in these ways, and not fixed either. Is that true? Can you compute the number of bug reports that are waiting for action by the maintainers?