From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Daniel Colascione" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [PATCH] use tail pointer for LOOP Date: Sun, 30 May 2010 13:09:57 -0400 Message-ID: References: <87pr0dfhge.fsf@gmail.com> Reply-To: Daniel Colascione NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=Alternative__boundary__1275239405254 X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1275240655 32392 80.91.229.12 (30 May 2010 17:30:55 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 30 May 2010 17:30:55 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Geoff Gole , Emacs development discussions To: "=?UTF-8?B?xaB0xJtww6FuIE7Em21lYw==?=" Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun May 30 19:30:53 2010 connect(): No such file or directory Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OImLZ-00086O-DQ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 30 May 2010 19:30:53 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:39981 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OIm1v-00023r-Of for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 30 May 2010 13:10:31 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=53880 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OIm1j-0001rG-7i for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 30 May 2010 13:10:25 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OIm1X-0004lD-T7 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 30 May 2010 13:10:08 -0400 Original-Received: from haystack.austinheap.com ([70.32.98.68]:38866 helo=haystacknetwork.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OIm1X-0004l1-Pz for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 30 May 2010 13:10:07 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87pr0dfhge.fsf@gmail.com> X-Mailer: Palm webOS v1.0.1 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:125361 Archived-At: --Alternative__boundary__1275239405254 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Good catch. That is indeed a typo. Clearly, that should be "nconcing". I'm= blaming dabbrev right now. :-) -- Sent from my Palm Pre On May 30, 2010 1:06 PM, =C5=A0t=C4=9Bp=C3=A1n N=C4=9Bmec <stepnem@gmail= =2Ecom> wrote:=20 Daniel Colascione <daniel@censorshipresearch.org> writes: > We do this only for the anonymous-variable case, but it's still an > improvement. > > --- > /Applications/Emacs.app/Contents/Resources/lisp/emacs-lisp/cl-macs.el > 2008-01-06 20:07:45.000000000 -0500 > +++ cl-macs2.el 2010-05-29 19:52:09.000000000 -0400 > - ((memq word '(nconc nconcing append appending)) > + ((memq word '(nconc noncing append appending)) [...] > + (let ((func (if (memq word '(nconc noncing)) [...] ??? If that's a typo (and I can hardly think about any other reason), then it's an interesting one, indeed. =C5=A0t=C4=9Bp=C3=A1n --Alternative__boundary__1275239405254 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Good catch. That is indeed a typo. Clearly, that should be "nconcing". I'm= blaming dabbrev right now. :-)



-- Sent fro= m my Palm Pre

On May 30,= 2010 1:06 PM, =C5=A0t=C4=9Bp=C3=A1n N=C4=9Bmec <stepnem@gmail.com>= wrote:

Daniel Colascione <daniel@censorshipresearch.org> wri= tes:

> We do this only for the anonymous-variable case, but it's still an
> improvement.
>
> ---
> /Applications/Emacs.app/Contents/Resources/lisp/emacs-lisp/cl-macs= =2Eel
> 2008-01-06 20:07:45.000000000 -0500
> +++ cl-macs2.el 2010-05-29 19:52:09.000000000 -0400
> - ((memq word '(nconc nconcing append appending))
> + ((memq word '(nconc noncing append appending))

[...]

> + (let ((func (if (memq word '(nconc noncing))

[...]

??? If that's a typo (and I can hardly think about any other reason),
then it's an interesting one, indeed.

=C5=A0t=C4=9Bp=C3=A1n

--Alternative__boundary__1275239405254--