From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
To: Thomas Lord <lord@emf.net>
Cc: wingo@pobox.com, tromey@redhat.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org
Subject: Re: guile and emacs and elisp, oh my!
Date: Sun, 25 Apr 2010 12:54:39 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <E1O656N-0005lr-7b@fencepost.gnu.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1272062597.6107.29.camel@dell-desktop.example.com> (message from Thomas Lord on Fri, 23 Apr 2010 15:43:17 -0700)
Sure, Schemers ought to be encouraged to write
"(null? x)" rather than "(eq? x '())" but ...
what about "(eq? x y)"?
My original plan was to have two execution modes,
a Lisp mode in which () and Scheme's false object are equal,
and a Scheme mode in which they were not equal.
I had a plan for nil too, but I don't remember what it was.
And: since Emacs lisp and Guile can't agree about
equality (whichever flavor) - how do I write a
hash table library useful to both environments?
It should hash all the kinds of nil the same.
Then, as regards the comparison, it can depend on
the execution mode as inherited from the caller.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-04-25 16:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-04-14 20:18 guile and emacs and elisp, oh my! Andy Wingo
2010-04-15 8:38 ` christian.lynbech
2010-04-15 8:53 ` joakim
2010-04-15 17:34 ` Andy Wingo
2010-04-15 23:54 ` Ken Raeburn
2010-04-16 6:48 ` joakim
2010-04-16 17:05 ` Ken Raeburn
2010-04-16 17:16 ` Ken Raeburn
2010-04-16 18:23 ` Stefan Monnier
2010-04-20 22:36 ` Tom Tromey
2010-04-21 7:37 ` christian.lynbech
2010-04-21 9:27 ` David Engster
2010-04-21 9:49 ` David Kastrup
2010-04-21 11:04 ` Lennart Borgman
2010-04-21 11:58 ` David Engster
2010-04-21 12:22 ` David Kastrup
2010-04-21 16:43 ` Ludovic Courtès
2010-04-22 9:35 ` Andy Wingo
2010-04-22 15:14 ` Karl Fogel
2010-04-25 19:36 ` Tom Tromey
2010-04-23 2:00 ` Thomas Lord
2010-04-23 8:28 ` Andy Wingo
2010-04-23 9:17 ` Ludovic Courtès
2010-04-23 10:19 ` christian.lynbech
2010-04-23 11:28 ` Andy Wingo
2010-04-23 11:31 ` christian.lynbech
2010-04-23 13:10 ` Andy Wingo
2010-04-23 22:43 ` Thomas Lord
2010-04-24 11:05 ` Andy Wingo
2010-04-25 0:02 ` Thomas Lord
2010-04-25 16:54 ` Richard Stallman [this message]
2010-04-25 17:11 ` Andy Wingo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=E1O656N-0005lr-7b@fencepost.gnu.org \
--to=rms@gnu.org \
--cc=emacs-devel@gnu.org \
--cc=lord@emf.net \
--cc=tromey@redhat.com \
--cc=wingo@pobox.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).