From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Alfred M. Szmidt" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: emacs from head segfaults when run with -nw Date: Thu, 08 Apr 2010 16:03:55 -0400 Message-ID: References: <83bpdyz2vz.fsf@gnu.org> <837homyowe.fsf@gnu.org> <831vetzzuh.fsf@gnu.org> <8339z8x8oq.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: ams@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1270757106 6132 80.91.229.12 (8 Apr 2010 20:05:06 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 8 Apr 2010 20:05:06 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Apr 08 22:05:04 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NzxyI-0006qo-Ew for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 08 Apr 2010 22:05:02 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:46751 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NzxyH-0003ly-VJ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 08 Apr 2010 16:05:01 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Nzxxl-0003e0-8M for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 08 Apr 2010 16:04:29 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=36412 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Nzxxk-0003dl-Oz for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 08 Apr 2010 16:04:28 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Nzxxj-0001Jk-Fx for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 08 Apr 2010 16:04:28 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]:60914) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NzxxX-0001J1-Np for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 08 Apr 2010 16:04:27 -0400 Original-Received: from ams by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NzxxD-0006pq-5C; Thu, 08 Apr 2010 16:03:55 -0400 In-reply-to: <8339z8x8oq.fsf@gnu.org> (message from Eli Zaretskii on Wed, 07 Apr 2010 06:06:45 +0300) X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:123361 Archived-At: > (gdb) xbacktrace > "where-is-internal" (0xbfffdd64) > "tool-bar-local-item-from-menu" (0xbfffe034) > "apply" (0xbfffe164) > "tool-bar-add-item-from-menu" (0xbfffe424) > "tool-bar-setup" (0xbfffe6e4) > "tool-bar-mode" (0xbfffe994) > "command-line" (0xbfffec54) > "normal-top-level" (0xbfffee70) ??? How come tool-bar functions are called in a non-GUI session? Non-GUI sessions could have tool-bar support, so it isn't harmful to call tool-bar-mode; very much like scroll-bar-mode is also called for non-GUI sessions.