From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Richard Stallman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: MS-Windows build broken in Fmake_network_process Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2010 19:39:01 -0400 Message-ID: References: <83634jglab.fsf@gnu.org> <831vf7ge57.fsf@gnu.org> <83y6hfeyzw.fsf@gnu.org> <83vdcig87f.fsf@gnu.org> <87k4sywpvv.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <83tys2fbxs.fsf@gnu.org> <87hbo1iubm.fsf@home.jasonrumney.net> <83ljddg0w9.fsf@gnu.org> <4BAE867D.3030404@gmail.com> <4BAE9ED4.6070900@t-online.de> <87tys12sdy.fsf@telefonica.net> Reply-To: rms@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1269906005 2321 80.91.229.12 (29 Mar 2010 23:40:05 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2010 23:40:05 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: =?utf-8?Q?=C3=93scar_Fuentes?= Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Mar 30 01:40:01 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NwOYp-0001p8-RF for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 30 Mar 2010 01:40:00 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:56431 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NwOYp-0007Fr-9C for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 29 Mar 2010 19:39:59 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NwOXw-0006gJ-1p for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 29 Mar 2010 19:39:04 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=41239 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NwOXv-0006g1-IJ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 29 Mar 2010 19:39:03 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NwOXu-00035J-HL for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 29 Mar 2010 19:39:03 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]:56524) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NwOXu-00035F-9g for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 29 Mar 2010 19:39:02 -0400 Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NwOXt-0003nd-Ik; Mon, 29 Mar 2010 19:39:01 -0400 In-reply-to: <87tys12sdy.fsf@telefonica.net> (message from =?utf-8?Q?=C3=93scar_Fuentes?= on Sun, 28 Mar 2010 01:37:29 +0100) X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:122887 Archived-At: If they run a 15 year old trashy OS, do they really demand the latest and greatest Emacs? (which is a very fat application for such machines) Our decision has nothing to do with their "demands" -- and I doubt they ever tried to make any "demands" on us. If they would rather run the latest Emacs, then making the latest Emacs run on their platform is a nice thing to do. However, it is not a high priority for us, because supporting any version of Windows is not a high priority for us. We have no commitment to support Windows 9, or Windows 7, or any version of Windows. People work on this if they want to do it, and they can choose which platforms to support.