From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: manuals [was Re: Next pretest, and branching plans]
Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2010 21:32:13 -0500
Message-ID: <E1NlCTV-0004bi-El@fencepost.gnu.org>
References: <4B8147A9.7030504@gmail.com> <87ljemdzxo.fsf@stupidchicken.com>
	<4B83682D.5010804@gnu.org> <E1NkAMe-0006wD-MQ@fencepost.gnu.org>
	<87vddmpw4s.fsf@stupidchicken.com>
	<E1Nkefh-0007P2-GV@fencepost.gnu.org>
	<uu4ol3oow3.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org>
Reply-To: rms@gnu.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15
X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1267237955 29591 80.91.229.12 (27 Feb 2010 02:32:35 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 27 Feb 2010 02:32:35 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: cschol2112@googlemail.com, cyd@stupidchicken.com, jasonr@gnu.org,
	eliz@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org
To: Glenn Morris <rgm@gnu.org>
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Feb 27 03:32:29 2010
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165])
	by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>)
	id 1NlCTf-0002cp-G7
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 27 Feb 2010 03:32:23 +0100
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:44750 helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1NlCTe-0002Wp-VF
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 26 Feb 2010 21:32:22 -0500
Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1NlCTZ-0002WX-No
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 26 Feb 2010 21:32:17 -0500
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=54904 helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NlCTY-0002WP-DT
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 26 Feb 2010 21:32:16 -0500
Original-Received: from Debian-exim by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim
	4.60) (envelope-from <rms@gnu.org>) id 1NlCTX-0007np-7l
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 26 Feb 2010 21:32:16 -0500
Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]:35040)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <rms@gnu.org>) id 1NlCTX-0007nj-1z
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 26 Feb 2010 21:32:15 -0500
Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <rms@gnu.org>)
	id 1NlCTV-0004bi-El; Fri, 26 Feb 2010 21:32:13 -0500
In-reply-to: <uu4ol3oow3.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> (message from Glenn Morris on
	Fri, 26 Feb 2010 13:03:40 -0500)
X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:121412
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/121412>

    The manuals were checked quite well before 23.1, so following the same
    policy as for Emacs 22, and only updating them where needed, seems
    fine to me.

If this was done thoroughly for 23.1, I agree there is no need to
repeat it now.