From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: Workflow to accumulate individual changes?
Date: Thu, 31 Dec 2009 21:54:51 -0500
Message-ID: <E1NQXf9-0002Js-D8@fencepost.gnu.org>
References: <f7ccd24b0912301334u6df4cf24k7625713ba8e4252@mail.gmail.com>
	<87fx6sm8yl.fsf@telefonica.net>
	<f7ccd24b0912301557s7e40ab26h8ee88c630757c1ce@mail.gmail.com>
	<873a2slzrr.fsf@telefonica.net>
	<f7ccd24b0912301733k510c6bbaub97223dcf2565055@mail.gmail.com>
	<83ws03db8v.fsf@gnu.org>
	<f7ccd24b0912302036y51436f47p164fe640f926cfb7@mail.gmail.com>
	<E1NQIVk-0007yV-LC@fencepost.gnu.org>
	<f7ccd24b0912310437o4f86e759n54e88a74c4bb3002@mail.gmail.com>
	<87skarapxo.fsf@red-bean.com>
Reply-To: rms@gnu.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15
X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1262314531 29194 80.91.229.12 (1 Jan 2010 02:55:31 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 1 Jan 2010 02:55:31 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: ofv@wanadoo.es, lekktu@gmail.com, eliz@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org
To: Karl Fogel <kfogel@red-bean.com>
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Jan 01 03:55:23 2010
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165])
	by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
	id 1NQXff-0007jO-2D
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 01 Jan 2010 03:55:23 +0100
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:58337 helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1NQXff-0004fy-1z
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 31 Dec 2009 21:55:23 -0500
Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1NQXfZ-0004fl-MJ
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 31 Dec 2009 21:55:17 -0500
Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1NQXfU-0004fB-KJ
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 31 Dec 2009 21:55:17 -0500
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=33834 helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NQXfU-0004f8-F3
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 31 Dec 2009 21:55:12 -0500
Original-Received: from [140.186.70.10] (port=46942 helo=fencepost.gnu.org)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <rms@gnu.org>) id 1NQXfU-0006hc-6M
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 31 Dec 2009 21:55:12 -0500
Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <rms@gnu.org>)
	id 1NQXf9-0002Js-D8; Thu, 31 Dec 2009 21:54:51 -0500
In-reply-to: <87skarapxo.fsf@red-bean.com> (message from Karl Fogel on Thu, 31
	Dec 2009 14:44:51 -0500)
X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:119182
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/119182>

    I've never used 'bzr rebase', and have no competency to evaluate the
    arguments either way here, but... wouldn't something would smell fishy
    if rebase were part of our regular workflow?  That somehow seems wrong.

Are you saying that hackers who rebase can get addicted? ;-).