From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Workflow to accumulate individual changes? Date: Thu, 31 Dec 2009 05:15:40 -0500 Message-ID: References: <87fx6sm8yl.fsf@telefonica.net> <873a2slzrr.fsf@telefonica.net> <83ws03db8v.fsf@gnu.org> <871vibu3ps.fsf@catnip.gol.com> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1262254588 23739 80.91.229.12 (31 Dec 2009 10:16:28 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 31 Dec 2009 10:16:28 +0000 (UTC) Cc: ofv@wanadoo.es, lekktu@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Miles Bader Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Dec 31 11:16:20 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1NQI4p-00032y-Qo for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 31 Dec 2009 11:16:20 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:59791 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NQI4p-0007Rt-Jj for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 31 Dec 2009 05:16:19 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NQI4h-0007RW-Q4 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 31 Dec 2009 05:16:11 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NQI4X-0007QE-M8 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 31 Dec 2009 05:16:11 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=45062 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NQI4X-0007Q8-Gv for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 31 Dec 2009 05:16:01 -0500 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.10] (port=37209 helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NQI4X-0007UH-8r for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 31 Dec 2009 05:16:01 -0500 Original-Received: from eliz by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NQI4C-0007BU-BY; Thu, 31 Dec 2009 05:15:40 -0500 In-reply-to: <871vibu3ps.fsf@catnip.gol.com> (message from Miles Bader on Thu, 31 Dec 2009 14:12:15 +0900) X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:119131 Archived-At: > From: Miles Bader > Cc: Eli Zaretskii , ofv@wanadoo.es, emacs-devel@gnu.org > Reply-To: Miles Bader > System-Type: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu > Date: Thu, 31 Dec 2009 14:12:15 +0900 > > To be honest, a huge amount of bzr docs and commentary seems to be > essentially bzr apologia trying to compensate for technical failings in > bzr by saying "ok, so bzr doesn't do that as well as the competition, > but you didn't really want to do that anyway... trust us..." Except that not only the documentation says that, the most active bzr developers say that as well. Maybe you know enough about bzr to decide that it's FUD or cheap marketing, but I'm willing to try the recommended way first, before I decide otherwise based on problems I bump into (if and when).