From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Potential copyright problem in EIEIO improvement Date: Wed, 30 Dec 2009 00:42:25 -0500 Message-ID: References: <23751_1262141343_ZZg0N7E3ZcBp~.00_1262141340.11263.18.camel@localhost.localdomain> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1262151790 2365 80.91.229.12 (30 Dec 2009 05:43:10 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 30 Dec 2009 05:43:10 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Jan Moringen Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Dec 30 06:43:03 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1NPrKo-0002qk-WE for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 30 Dec 2009 06:43:03 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:52471 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NPrKp-0005LW-Fo for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 30 Dec 2009 00:43:03 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NPrKi-0005L1-7a for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 30 Dec 2009 00:42:56 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NPrKY-0005Ji-9a for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 30 Dec 2009 00:42:55 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=55816 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NPrKY-0005Jf-3k for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 30 Dec 2009 00:42:46 -0500 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.10] (port=40982 helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NPrKX-0002bV-Pl for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 30 Dec 2009 00:42:45 -0500 Original-Received: from eliz by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NPrKD-0006Y5-0F; Wed, 30 Dec 2009 00:42:25 -0500 In-reply-to: <23751_1262141343_ZZg0N7E3ZcBp~.00_1262141340.11263.18.camel@localhost.localdomain> (message from Jan Moringen on Wed, 30 Dec 2009 03:49:00 +0100) X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:119018 Archived-At: > Date: Wed, 30 Dec 2009 03:49:00 +0100 > From: Jan Moringen > > Basically, I implemented an algorithm (c3 linearization) which is > described in an academic paper (see below). My implementation is very > close to the implementation presented in the paper (although that one is > written in Dylan). > [...] > Any thoughts on this issue would be greatly appreciated. I can try to > provide additional information if required. To my non-lawyer's eyes, the two implementations are so different in form that they only share the same idea. And ideas are not copyrightable, AFAIK. But IANAL.