From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Richard Stallman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: t and nil in pure memory? Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2009 23:56:54 -0500 Message-ID: References: <200911112023.nABKNrH6023933@godzilla.ics.uci.edu> Reply-To: rms@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1258089084 6696 80.91.229.12 (13 Nov 2009 05:11:24 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2009 05:11:24 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Dan Nicolaescu Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Nov 13 06:11:17 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1N8oRI-0004MW-Fe for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 13 Nov 2009 06:11:16 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:55903 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1N8oRH-0006km-OJ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 13 Nov 2009 00:11:15 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1N8oDa-0000zW-RO for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 12 Nov 2009 23:57:06 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1N8oDW-0000w2-4x for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 12 Nov 2009 23:57:06 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=43281 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1N8oDV-0000vy-Sh for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 12 Nov 2009 23:57:01 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]:40294) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1N8oDV-000561-Di for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 12 Nov 2009 23:57:01 -0500 Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1N8oDO-0004Et-6P; Thu, 12 Nov 2009 23:56:54 -0500 In-reply-to: <200911112023.nABKNrH6023933@godzilla.ics.uci.edu> (message from Dan Nicolaescu on Wed, 11 Nov 2009 12:23:53 -0800 (PST)) X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:116924 Archived-At: Would it make sense to put Qt and Qnil in pure memory? That isn't valid. The property lists of t and nil have to be writable. We could store the property lists of t and nil in a special way. Then they could be pure, as long as we make sure their oblist links never need to be changed.