From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
To: Dan Nicolaescu <dann@ics.uci.edu>
Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
Subject: Re: t and nil in pure memory?
Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2009 23:56:54 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <E1N8oDO-0004Et-6P@fencepost.gnu.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200911112023.nABKNrH6023933@godzilla.ics.uci.edu> (message from Dan Nicolaescu on Wed, 11 Nov 2009 12:23:53 -0800 (PST))
Would it make sense to put Qt and Qnil in pure memory?
That isn't valid. The property lists of t and nil have to be writable.
We could store the property lists of t and nil in a special way. Then
they could be pure, as long as we make sure their oblist links never
need to be changed.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-11-13 4:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-11-11 20:23 t and nil in pure memory? Dan Nicolaescu
2009-11-11 22:56 ` Stefan Monnier
2009-11-12 8:21 ` Tobias C. Rittweiler
2009-11-12 15:22 ` Stefan Monnier
2009-11-13 5:24 ` Dan Nicolaescu
2009-11-13 14:39 ` Stefan Monnier
2009-11-14 11:23 ` Richard Stallman
2009-11-15 20:25 ` David Kastrup
2009-11-16 1:26 ` Stefan Monnier
2009-11-16 8:24 ` David Kastrup
2009-11-17 7:57 ` Richard Stallman
2009-11-17 13:16 ` Stefan Monnier
2009-11-17 13:55 ` David Kastrup
2009-11-18 12:11 ` Richard Stallman
2009-11-18 15:52 ` Stefan Monnier
2009-11-18 17:53 ` Daniel Colascione
2009-11-18 18:19 ` Stefan Monnier
2009-11-19 16:23 ` Richard Stallman
2009-11-19 20:08 ` Stefan Monnier
2009-11-20 4:12 ` Richard Stallman
2009-11-20 5:47 ` Chong Yidong
2009-11-22 6:48 ` Sam Steingold
2009-11-22 8:14 ` David Kastrup
2009-11-19 21:05 ` Dan Nicolaescu
2009-11-15 21:08 ` Dan Nicolaescu
2009-11-16 1:34 ` Stefan Monnier
2009-11-18 18:53 ` Ken Raeburn
2009-11-18 19:03 ` Daniel Colascione
2009-11-18 19:18 ` Tom Tromey
2009-11-18 19:13 ` Tom Tromey
2009-11-23 3:05 ` Ken Raeburn
2009-11-23 5:31 ` Stephen J. Turnbull
2009-11-24 16:03 ` Ken Raeburn
2009-11-24 16:28 ` Stefan Monnier
2009-11-19 1:01 ` Stefan Monnier
2009-11-12 4:06 ` Eli Zaretskii
2009-11-13 4:55 ` Richard Stallman
2009-11-13 8:37 ` Eli Zaretskii
2009-11-14 11:23 ` Richard Stallman
2009-11-14 11:46 ` Eli Zaretskii
2009-11-15 22:38 ` Richard Stallman
2009-11-13 4:56 ` Richard Stallman [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2009-11-20 7:28 A. Soare
2009-11-20 8:09 ` David Kastrup
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=E1N8oDO-0004Et-6P@fencepost.gnu.org \
--to=rms@gnu.org \
--cc=dann@ics.uci.edu \
--cc=emacs-devel@gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).