From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Richard Stallman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Breakpoint ignored. Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2009 18:53:31 -0400 Message-ID: References: <877hutz9zb.fsf@telefonica.net> <83hbtxgwqz.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: rms@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1255992832 10366 80.91.229.12 (19 Oct 2009 22:53:52 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2009 22:53:52 +0000 (UTC) Cc: ofv@wanadoo.es, eliz@gnu.org, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Miles Bader Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Oct 20 00:53:41 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1N016j-0008PQ-Fr for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 20 Oct 2009 00:53:41 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41421 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1N016j-0005tw-4j for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 19 Oct 2009 18:53:41 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1N016f-0005tr-Fu for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 19 Oct 2009 18:53:37 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1N016a-0005tP-Us for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 19 Oct 2009 18:53:37 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=43743 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1N016a-0005tM-RR for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 19 Oct 2009 18:53:32 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]:59364) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1N016a-0002YV-Hf for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 19 Oct 2009 18:53:32 -0400 Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1N016Z-0001dx-Sz; Mon, 19 Oct 2009 18:53:31 -0400 In-reply-to: (message from Miles Bader on Mon, 19 Oct 2009 15:22:17 +0900) X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:116258 Archived-At: > I've removed the optimization here, and can't tell the difference even > on my 400MHz cell phone. Tho I imagine it's hard to type very quickly on a cell phone! (at least compared to the speed of typing with a real keyboard) If Emacs has no trouble handling typing at real typing speed then it is working fast enough.