From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Richard Stallman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Breakpoint ignored. Date: Sun, 18 Oct 2009 22:39:01 -0400 Message-ID: References: <877hutz9zb.fsf@telefonica.net> <83hbtxgwqz.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: rms@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1255919963 13451 80.91.229.12 (19 Oct 2009 02:39:23 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2009 02:39:23 +0000 (UTC) Cc: ofv@wanadoo.es, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Oct 19 04:39:13 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Mzi9R-0007nl-LY for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 19 Oct 2009 04:39:13 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:59716 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Mzi9Q-0000qV-VL for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 18 Oct 2009 22:39:12 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Mzi9L-0000pI-C9 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 18 Oct 2009 22:39:07 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Mzi9G-0000mv-7j for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 18 Oct 2009 22:39:06 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=45680 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Mzi9G-0000mi-0P for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 18 Oct 2009 22:39:02 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]:47810) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Mzi9F-0007tg-NJ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 18 Oct 2009 22:39:01 -0400 Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1Mzi9F-0002cy-0T; Sun, 18 Oct 2009 22:39:01 -0400 In-reply-to: <83hbtxgwqz.fsf@gnu.org> (message from Eli Zaretskii on Sun, 18 Oct 2009 06:19:00 +0200) X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:116238 Archived-At: You are probably missing the fact that Emacs tries to optimize the case of insertion of a single character. This optimization was very important in 1985. But computers are much faster now. Perhaps it would be ok to delete this optimization, or add a variable to control it and turn on the variable only on the slower computers.