From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: persistent lisp objects
Date: Sat, 03 Oct 2009 16:13:30 -0400
Message-ID: <E1MuAyw-0001yx-4h@fencepost.gnu.org>
References: <d2afcfda0910021355m53aa23a5jb3e36c2c1a64b1b0@mail.gmail.com>
Reply-To: rms@gnu.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15
X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1254600829 20595 80.91.229.12 (3 Oct 2009 20:13:49 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 3 Oct 2009 20:13:49 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: thierry.volpiatto@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org
To: MON KEY <monkey@sandpframing.com>
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Oct 03 22:13:42 2009
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165])
	by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
	id 1MuAz7-0001Q2-DR
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 03 Oct 2009 22:13:41 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:48743 helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1MuAz6-0007As-BI
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 03 Oct 2009 16:13:40 -0400
Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1MuAz1-00079K-HK
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 03 Oct 2009 16:13:35 -0400
Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1MuAyw-0006zY-On
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 03 Oct 2009 16:13:34 -0400
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=54963 helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MuAyw-0006zI-L4
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 03 Oct 2009 16:13:30 -0400
Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]:56787)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <rms@gnu.org>) id 1MuAyw-0008SL-Dv
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 03 Oct 2009 16:13:30 -0400
Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.67)
	(envelope-from <rms@gnu.org>)
	id 1MuAyw-0001yx-4h; Sat, 03 Oct 2009 16:13:30 -0400
In-reply-to: <d2afcfda0910021355m53aa23a5jb3e36c2c1a64b1b0@mail.gmail.com>
	(message from MON KEY on Fri, 2 Oct 2009 16:55:15 -0400)
X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6,
	seldom 2.4 (older, 4)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:115885
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/115885>

The copyright on compiler output follows the copyright on the input
that was compiled.  In other words, the copyright holder of the input
also has the copyright on the output.  So if the output this produces
is a translation of some code, the copyright goes with the code that
was translated.  Otherwise I suppose it belongs to whoever decided to
produce it.

The Bison case is different and not relevant here.