From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Richard Stallman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: update-subdirs and lisp/term Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2009 17:58:41 -0400 Message-ID: References: <831vlut4sy.fsf@gnu.org> <83ws3mrm6f.fsf@gnu.org> <833a67shhs.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: rms@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1254175142 21865 80.91.229.12 (28 Sep 2009 21:59:02 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2009 21:59:02 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Sep 28 23:58:55 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1MsOF9-00040p-TL for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 28 Sep 2009 23:58:52 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:43868 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MsOF9-0006RV-Hz for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 28 Sep 2009 17:58:51 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MsOF4-0006RG-CF for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 28 Sep 2009 17:58:46 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MsOF0-0006R1-1R for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 28 Sep 2009 17:58:45 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=41458 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MsOEz-0006Qy-S7 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 28 Sep 2009 17:58:41 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]:46431) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MsOEz-0000Jd-Ha for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 28 Sep 2009 17:58:41 -0400 Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1MsOEz-0006n6-9x; Mon, 28 Sep 2009 17:58:41 -0400 In-reply-to: <833a67shhs.fsf@gnu.org> (message from Eli Zaretskii on Mon, 28 Sep 2009 08:36:31 +0200) X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:115746 Archived-At: > Omitting this directory speeds up searches for other files. This might have been a good reason back when term/ was the only subdirectory in lisp/ (Emacs 19.x). But nowadays we have 21 subdirectories besides term/ (and soon we will have 5 more). Does a single directory really make a difference? It makes some difference; why make even a small slowdown for all the users just for a small simplification? Perhaps it would be useful to design some other way to speed up the search for files.