From: Kenichi Handa <handa@m17n.org>
To: Dan Nicolaescu <dann@ics.uci.edu>
Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
Subject: Re: profiling emacs-23.1 vs emacs-22.3
Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2009 20:39:47 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <E1MfXtr-0006iv-3U@etlken> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200908240807.n7O87ubg024643@godzilla.ics.uci.edu> (message from Dan Nicolaescu on Mon, 24 Aug 2009 01:07:56 -0700 (PDT))
In article <200908240807.n7O87ubg024643@godzilla.ics.uci.edu>, Dan Nicolaescu <dann@ics.uci.edu> writes:
> Could you try the attached patch? If it improves the
> It does improve performance:
How much in real time?
[...]
> It's still slower than 22.3 though.
> One big difference is then time/number of calls to mark_objects
> 129733 vs 18834514, so 145 times more calls to mark_object.
> Do you know where do those come from?
> The number of Fgarbage_collect calls does not increase that much:
> from 37 (for 22.3) to 43 (for 23.1).
It seems that c-indent-region has been changed a lot. I'm
not sure, but perhaps that is the reason. How do the other
people think?
---
Kenichi Handa
handa@m17n.org
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-08-24 11:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-08-03 20:29 profiling emacs-23.1 vs emacs-22.3 Dan Nicolaescu
2009-08-04 17:10 ` Leo
2009-08-04 19:50 ` Chong Yidong
2009-08-04 19:56 ` Dan Nicolaescu
2009-08-05 7:47 ` Dan Nicolaescu
2009-08-24 6:52 ` Kenichi Handa
[not found] ` <200908240807.n7O87ubg024643@godzilla.ics.uci.edu>
2009-08-24 11:39 ` Kenichi Handa [this message]
2009-08-24 18:26 ` Dan Nicolaescu
2009-08-25 6:07 ` Kenichi Handa
2009-08-25 18:47 ` Dan Nicolaescu
2009-08-26 6:01 ` Kenichi Handa
2009-08-26 6:33 ` Dan Nicolaescu
2009-08-26 8:06 ` Kenichi Handa
2009-08-26 20:46 ` Andreas Schwab
2009-08-27 2:02 ` Kenichi Handa
2009-08-27 6:27 ` Kenichi Handa
2009-08-24 22:18 ` Alan Mackenzie
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=E1MfXtr-0006iv-3U@etlken \
--to=handa@m17n.org \
--cc=dann@ics.uci.edu \
--cc=emacs-devel@gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).