From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Alfred M. Szmidt" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: rmail-default-file vs. (deleted) rmail-default-rmail-file Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2009 02:45:35 -0400 Message-ID: References: <87tz1meydj.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <87ljmtooku.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <87ab3970r0.fsf@stupidchicken.com> Reply-To: ams@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1247467555 31009 80.91.229.12 (13 Jul 2009 06:45:55 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2009 06:45:55 +0000 (UTC) Cc: rms@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Chong Yidong Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Jul 13 08:45:48 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1MQFIK-0001cn-2P for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 13 Jul 2009 08:45:48 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:58930 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MQFIJ-0001mG-FJ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 13 Jul 2009 02:45:47 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MQFIE-0001mA-VS for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 13 Jul 2009 02:45:43 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MQFIA-0001kK-Do for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 13 Jul 2009 02:45:42 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=34457 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MQFIA-0001kD-Be for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 13 Jul 2009 02:45:38 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]:58545) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MQFIA-0004jn-1E for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 13 Jul 2009 02:45:38 -0400 Original-Received: from ams by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1MQFI7-0005kc-5i; Mon, 13 Jul 2009 02:45:35 -0400 In-reply-to: <87ab3970r0.fsf@stupidchicken.com> (message from Chong Yidong on Sun, 12 Jul 2009 22:52:35 -0400) X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:112396 Archived-At: > But as regards ~/xmail vs ~/XMAIL for the default, ISTR that > during the transition to mbox format I saw an advantage in making > the default different. But in fact the current Rmail deals just > fine with saving into Babyl files, so I now think it is better to > keep the default unchanged from Emacs 22. Fine by me. Alfred, if you like, go ahead and switch to XMAIL on the trunk and branch. Sorry, I do not understand.