From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Richard M Stallman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: How to show *Warnings* buffer at startup time? [Re: Pretest next week] Date: Sun, 17 May 2009 13:23:53 -0400 Message-ID: References: <87ab5ev286.fsf@cyd.mit.edu> <87pre85tda.fsf@cyd.mit.edu> Reply-To: rms@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1242581056 6962 80.91.229.12 (17 May 2009 17:24:16 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 17 May 2009 17:24:16 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org, handa@m17n.org To: Chong Yidong Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun May 17 19:24:09 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1M5k5p-0000Lm-0j for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 17 May 2009 19:24:09 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:49583 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1M5k5o-0001Lv-9n for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 17 May 2009 13:24:08 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1M5k5i-0001JC-At for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 17 May 2009 13:24:02 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1M5k5d-0001Ci-Gr for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 17 May 2009 13:24:01 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=33395 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1M5k5d-0001CT-CN for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 17 May 2009 13:23:57 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]:35187) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1M5k5c-0001hp-Vu for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 17 May 2009 13:23:57 -0400 Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1M5k5Z-0005qO-3e; Sun, 17 May 2009 13:23:53 -0400 In-reply-to: <87pre85tda.fsf@cyd.mit.edu> (message from Chong Yidong on Sat, 16 May 2009 22:57:21 -0400) X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:110948 Archived-At: > If there is a bug in a change since Emacs 23, we should certainly fix > it. This is not a regression, I think. A bad wrinkle in new feature is never a regression, but now (before it is released) is the best time to fix it.