From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: please make line-move-visual nil Date: Sun, 17 May 2009 06:48:27 -0400 Message-ID: References: <23521879.post@talk.nabble.com> <7b501d5c0905131659r1d79ec56s5a59f76e4713edf9@mail.gmail.com> <23532135.post@talk.nabble.com> <87tz3odq3l.fsf@iki.fi> <23538683.post@talk.nabble.com> <87eiuru24b.fsf@iki.fi> <39370.130.55.118.19.1242397867.squirrel@webmail.lanl.gov> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1242557531 10548 80.91.229.12 (17 May 2009 10:52:11 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 17 May 2009 10:52:11 +0000 (UTC) Cc: tlikonen@iki.fi, garyo@genarts.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: ams@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun May 17 12:52:03 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1M5dyM-0006lo-P7 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 17 May 2009 12:52:03 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:33388 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1M5dyL-0000pz-0U for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 17 May 2009 06:52:01 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1M5dyC-0000p4-KI for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 17 May 2009 06:51:52 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1M5dy6-0000lG-A3 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 17 May 2009 06:51:50 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=41148 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1M5dy6-0000lD-5a for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 17 May 2009 06:51:46 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]:47964) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1M5dy5-0007a0-QV for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 17 May 2009 06:51:45 -0400 Original-Received: from eliz by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1M5dut-0002da-AI; Sun, 17 May 2009 06:48:27 -0400 In-reply-to: (ams@gnu.org) X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:110946 Archived-At: > From: "Alfred M. Szmidt" > Date: Sun, 17 May 2009 02:29:38 -0400 > Cc: tlikonen@iki.fi, garyo@genarts.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org > Reply-To: ams@gnu.org > > Perhaps this is too obvious to mention: why not make `next-line' > treat `line-move-visual' as nil whenever it is given a prefix > argument? It would not be difficult to decorate usage of > C-n/C-p// with C-1 in macros that already exist. > > C-u C-n (and its variants) is a very useful movement command. Indeed. I hope no one is seriously considering to interpret a numeric argument to these commands as anything other than the number of lines to move.