From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Kenichi Handa Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: fontset/font change Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2009 15:40:41 +0900 Message-ID: References: <87ljrcb23h.fsf@catnip.gol.com> <87ab7rwny3.fsf@catnip.gol.com> <87eix32xfa.fsf@cyd.mit.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1236840052 14057 80.91.229.12 (12 Mar 2009 06:40:52 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2009 06:40:52 +0000 (UTC) Cc: miles@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Chong Yidong Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Mar 12 07:42:09 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1LhecJ-0006LI-L6 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 12 Mar 2009 07:42:07 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:51923 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Lheax-0002IH-SN for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 12 Mar 2009 02:40:43 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Lheat-0002I7-5o for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 12 Mar 2009 02:40:39 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Lheas-0002Hv-9b for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 12 Mar 2009 02:40:38 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=60176 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Lheas-0002Hs-72 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 12 Mar 2009 02:40:38 -0400 Original-Received: from mx1.aist.go.jp ([150.29.246.133]:37831) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Lheao-0004Rr-BG; Thu, 12 Mar 2009 02:40:34 -0400 Original-Received: from rqsmtp1.aist.go.jp (rqsmtp1.aist.go.jp [150.29.254.115]) by mx1.aist.go.jp with ESMTP id n2C6eV3d003041; Thu, 12 Mar 2009 15:40:31 +0900 (JST) env-from (handa@m17n.org) Original-Received: from smtp1.aist.go.jp by rqsmtp1.aist.go.jp with ESMTP id n2C6eViG005825; Thu, 12 Mar 2009 15:40:31 +0900 (JST) env-from (handa@m17n.org) Original-Received: by smtp1.aist.go.jp with ESMTP id n2C6eU10008585; Thu, 12 Mar 2009 15:40:30 +0900 (JST) env-from (handa@m17n.org) Original-Received: from handa by etlken with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Lheav-0006ed-QL; Thu, 12 Mar 2009 15:40:41 +0900 In-reply-to: <87eix32xfa.fsf@cyd.mit.edu> (message from Chong Yidong on Thu, 12 Mar 2009 00:10:49 -0400) X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: Solaris 9 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:109585 Archived-At: In article <87eix32xfa.fsf@cyd.mit.edu>, Chong Yidong writes: > > Sorry for the confusion, but what should I do now? > > > > (1) Just recover the behaviour of Emacs 22: nil for the default > > (2) Make nil for the currently selected fontset, and t for the default > > (3) (1) and make t for the currently selected one. > It seems a little cleaner to have nil specify the current fontset rather > than fontset-default, but only a little. In your estimation, is there a > significant amount of outside code (e.g. user customizations) that rely > on the old behavior? I don't think so because I don't here any complaints about it after I changed t for the default long ago in emacs-unicode-2 branch. And even since the merge of about one year ago, there's no complaint either. So, if you maintainers think that the incompatible change now is ok, I'll do (2) above quickly. > As Miles mentioned, either way this needs to be documented in the > docstring. Sure. --- Kenichi Handa handa@m17n.org