From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Richard M Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: rmail-toggle-header problem
Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 08:30:52 -0500
Message-ID: <E1LaVSu-0006ql-WF@fencepost.gnu.org>
References: <1sbpsyf9y4.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org>
Reply-To: rms@gnu.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15
X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1235137758 14489 80.91.229.12 (20 Feb 2009 13:49:18 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 13:49:18 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org, handa@m17n.org
To: Glenn Morris <rgm@gnu.org>
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Feb 20 14:50:34 2009
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165])
	by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
	id 1LaVlx-0002P5-GK
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 20 Feb 2009 14:50:33 +0100
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:59750 helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1LaVkd-0002le-8y
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 20 Feb 2009 08:49:11 -0500
Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1LaVh7-0007Nv-0z
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 20 Feb 2009 08:45:33 -0500
Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1LaVh6-0007MX-5E
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 20 Feb 2009 08:45:32 -0500
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=48545 helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LaVh5-0007Lv-Jg
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 20 Feb 2009 08:45:31 -0500
Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]:57534)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <rms@gnu.org>) id 1LaVh5-0004dJ-Bm
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 20 Feb 2009 08:45:31 -0500
Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.67)
	(envelope-from <rms@gnu.org>)
	id 1LaVSu-0006ql-WF; Fri, 20 Feb 2009 08:30:53 -0500
In-reply-to: <1sbpsyf9y4.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> (message from Glenn Morris on
	Thu, 19 Feb 2009 15:28:19 -0500)
X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6,
	seldom 2.4 (older, 4)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:109250
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/109250>

    I'm not sure that yanking from the full headers makes a lot of sense,
    though. Eg it includes the X-RMAIL headers in the yank. Would you ever
    want to include the full headers (all the Received: etc) in a reply?

I doubt it, but this combination ought to do what is natural in the
circumstances, which is to yank the headers that are visible.
To do otherwise would require artificially filtering them
in a second place.

 if the user asks for it, we may as well do what he
asked for.