From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Richard M Stallman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Recognize mbox files? Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 07:10:37 -0500 Message-ID: References: Reply-To: rms@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1234959480 11160 80.91.229.12 (18 Feb 2009 12:18:00 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 12:18:00 +0000 (UTC) Cc: cyd@stupidchicken.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org, xma@gnu.org, ams@gnu.org, monnier@IRO.UMontreal.CA, turnbull@sk.tsukuba.ac.jp To: Miles Bader Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Feb 18 13:19:13 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1LZlOR-0001tM-TK for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 18 Feb 2009 13:19:12 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:56947 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LZlN7-0005Wl-0M for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 18 Feb 2009 07:17:49 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LZlIF-0001ZE-Dv for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 18 Feb 2009 07:12:47 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LZlIE-0001YT-9k for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 18 Feb 2009 07:12:46 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=43408 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LZlID-0001YO-WA for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 18 Feb 2009 07:12:46 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]:41731) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LZlID-00085S-Qx for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 18 Feb 2009 07:12:45 -0500 Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1LZlG9-0001ut-IP; Wed, 18 Feb 2009 07:10:37 -0500 In-reply-to: (message from Miles Bader on Wed, 18 Feb 2009 12:39:03 +0900) X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:109184 Archived-At: I see no reason _not_ to use the From_ line... it rarely contains anything particularly valuable (other than the "From_" prefix which marks it as a separator), and since its syntax isn't well-defined, any information that _is_ there is only ever used for human perusal -- and appending a -*- variable doesn't cause problems for humans. We would need to verify that this does not cause problems in any other often-used mail reader program.