From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Kenichi Handa Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: What does `undecided' do for encoding text? Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 16:01:10 +0900 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1234249289 21685 80.91.229.12 (10 Feb 2009 07:01:29 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 07:01:29 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Feb 10 08:02:44 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1LWmdn-0000eK-UD for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 10 Feb 2009 08:02:44 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:57756 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LWmcU-0007LA-Cy for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 10 Feb 2009 02:01:22 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LWmcP-0007Kv-QE for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 10 Feb 2009 02:01:17 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LWmcO-0007Kj-Qn for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 10 Feb 2009 02:01:17 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=35925 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LWmcO-0007Kg-Kg for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 10 Feb 2009 02:01:16 -0500 Original-Received: from mx1.aist.go.jp ([150.29.246.133]:54235) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LWmcL-0003F0-Uw; Tue, 10 Feb 2009 02:01:14 -0500 Original-Received: from rqsmtp1.aist.go.jp (rqsmtp1.aist.go.jp [150.29.254.115]) by mx1.aist.go.jp with ESMTP id n1A71BEt025577; Tue, 10 Feb 2009 16:01:11 +0900 (JST) env-from (handa@m17n.org) Original-Received: from smtp1.aist.go.jp by rqsmtp1.aist.go.jp with ESMTP id n1A71BVw017820; Tue, 10 Feb 2009 16:01:11 +0900 (JST) env-from (handa@m17n.org) Original-Received: by smtp1.aist.go.jp with ESMTP id n1A718d7008467; Tue, 10 Feb 2009 16:01:08 +0900 (JST) env-from (handa@m17n.org) Original-Received: from handa by etlken with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1LWmcI-0005fr-JU; Tue, 10 Feb 2009 16:01:10 +0900 In-reply-to: (message from Eli Zaretskii on Sat, 07 Feb 2009 17:32:58 +0200) X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: Solaris 9 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:108930 Archived-At: In article , Eli Zaretskii writes: > It looks like `undecided' works the same as `raw-text' for encoding > text. Is that true in general? Yes. More exactly, it is the same as `raw-text-unix'. > I think this should be reflected in the ELisp manual. I don't think so because it is just a fallback behavior, and Elisp programmer should avoid specifying `undecided' on encoding. --- Kenichi Handa handa@m17n.org