From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Richard M Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: Emacs-Lisp Bill-Board
Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2009 00:30:45 -0500
Message-ID: <E1LWOjF-0005IQ-G9@fencepost.gnu.org>
References: <87vdrqo5sy.fsf@CPU107.opentrends.net>
Reply-To: rms@gnu.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15
X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1234157574 4374 80.91.229.12 (9 Feb 2009 05:32:54 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2009 05:32:54 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
To: Daniel Clemente <dcl441-bugs@yahoo.com>
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Feb 09 06:34:09 2009
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165])
	by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
	id 1LWOmW-0000yn-E6
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 09 Feb 2009 06:34:08 +0100
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:46211 helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1LWOlD-0003q5-28
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 09 Feb 2009 00:32:47 -0500
Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1LWOl8-0003ps-3u
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 09 Feb 2009 00:32:42 -0500
Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1LWOl6-0003pg-Ip
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 09 Feb 2009 00:32:41 -0500
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=52326 helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LWOl6-0003pd-EO
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 09 Feb 2009 00:32:40 -0500
Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]:48265)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <rms@gnu.org>) id 1LWOl6-0002nx-7K
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 09 Feb 2009 00:32:40 -0500
Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.67)
	(envelope-from <rms@gnu.org>)
	id 1LWOjF-0005IQ-G9; Mon, 09 Feb 2009 00:30:45 -0500
In-reply-to: <87vdrqo5sy.fsf@CPU107.opentrends.net> (message from Daniel
	Clemente on Wed, 04 Feb 2009 11:27:41 +0100)
X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6,
	seldom 2.4 (older, 4)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:108880
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/108880>

It sounds good as you've described it.  The best way for people to see
if it really is that good, and suggest changes, is if some of us
try visiting http://orgmode.org/worg/ and playing with it.
Then we could get some useful feedback.